Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Neurotechnology and Communication

Back in May of '08, I posted this blog about monkeys using their thoughts to control machines. It is based on a New York Times article. There are practical prosthetic applications, and the video is pure hilarity, but the relevance to communication and collaboration was less obvious to me at the time of writing. But in a wonderful coincidence, this article and concept have re-entered my life, and there is great clarity around how it applies to communication.

I was "Session Captain" at a few sessions in Boston recently. See the 8:45 Focus Session on Neurotechnology at this year's CIMIT Innovation Congress. Note that the presenter was none other than John Donaghue, PhD, of Brown University. Donaghue is a leading expert in brain science, and was referenced and quoted in the NYTimes article that the previous post was based upon!

In the session, Donaghue shared stories told through media and personal accounts (masterful presenter, check him out if you have the chance and take note of his style) how minuscule brain implants can interpret signals from brain cells that are indicating to limbs - whether or not they even exist or function - how they should operate. These same implants can take that information and instruct prosthetics or say, a cursor on a computer screen, to move in a certain manner. We watched a video of a man with no control of his limbs control a cursor to draw a circle on a screen, directed only by thought. It was pretty unsuccessful his first try, but he was able to clear his screen and by the third attempt he had produced what you would recognize as a circle. Incredible.

Don't worry, I'm getting to the communication piece...

Also on the panel was epileptologist Dr. Anthony L Ritaccio from Albany Medical College. Instead of using invasive chips, Dr. Ritaccio is monitoring brain waves (see relevant posts here) to try and predict the onset of seizures. This is leading edge research, but another thing he said that stuck with me was how this kind of technology can one day do more than replace motor skills and forecast seizures. It can change the way our race communicates.

Since the early days of the homo sapien, we as a species have communicated syntactically. The way we communicate has not changed much since we were cavemen. We use symbols and noises. That could all change though. Advances in neurotechnology could see us mastering semantic communication in the future, sharing concepts with one another without common language or background. The possibilities for collaboration are limitless if/when this is achieved. I hope I live to see (or see? or think? or feel?) it.

Also of interest, all of the experts in these panels cited the multidisciplinary nature of the collaborations taht will need to take place to advance this field as perhaps the greatest challenge. Great recognition for a sometimes underappreciated problem.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

This seems to be one step closer to Kurzweil's predicted "Singularity". If so, just make sure that you're staying with us until 2045!

This is fantastic technology, by the way, and incredible research. Were the day much longer, I'd be quite interested in reading more about Donaghue's work.

One question: you mentioned that his style in presenting is impressive. What about it made it noteworthy for you?

Andrew said...

Use of engaging media, storytelling, and some other well documented techniques contributed to making his presentation exceptional. But is was his humility that perhaps stood out the most for me.

Here we were, in the presence of many world-class surgeons, researchers and industry representatives. A lot of time is often used with this type of audience just establishing credibility. Donaghue let his passion and work speak for itself, but he never boasted about his work. He spoke of findings and advances without ever laying claim to them. At the end he had to mention his ownership of some of the ideas for full disclosure purposes, and I was astonished that he hadn't attach "I did this" or "I discovered" anywhere throughout the presentation.

The delivery wasn't about him, it was about the subject matter. That's always a good thing, but particularly significant among this crowd.